Skip to main content
In re Forfeiture of Five Thousand Two Hundred Sixty-four Dollars
430 Mich 891
1988
 

OPINION

  On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is GRANTED, limited to the issue whether the store building was subject to forfeiture under MCL 333.7521; MSA 14.15(7521).

Dorothy Comstock Riley, Chief Justice, Charles L. Levin, James H. Brickley, Michael F. Cavanagh, Patricia J. Boyle, Dennis W. Archer, Robert P. Griffin, Associate Justices

About

I am one of Michigan's leading criminal defense attorneys, and I frequently cross over into the realm of civil litigation when my clients face civil asset forfeiture claims. Cash and US currency seizures, car seizures, and even homes and real estate may be subject to Michigan's civil asset forfeiture laws, and I have successfully fought the Wayne County Prosecutor's Office, the FBI, the DEA, and US Customs on civil asset forfeiture cases.

Featured Posts

Contact info

Maze Legal PLC is committed to aggressive ethical representation, excellence, and professionalism.

  • 15233 Farmington Rd., Livonia, Michigan 48154
  • (734) 591-0100
  • 37211 Goddard Rd., Romulus, Michigan 48174
  • (734) 941-8800